Joseph 的个人资料Reverend Joseph T. Evans...照片日志列表更多 ![]() | 帮助 |
|
7月17日 Why am I "here"?
By Joseph T. Evans
Is this only a dream or I’m actually here. How did I get here. What was it that determined that it was my time to be here. I know that I exist. I feel that I am alive, but where is here and why am I here, now. I mean I know that the act of intercourse brings about a child and that child grows. And, weather it’s nature versus nurture that controls the outcome of who I become, how come I didn’t come into being in 1525 or 200bc, but rather I came into being in 1970. What were that alignment of planets that said you will now be; Joseph it is now your turn to exist. God, if you exist in some form, I fight with this perplexing question and I’m constantly looking for answers. This dogmatic life-long pursuit for answers has me torn between two schools of though. I’ve read the Torah, the Quran, and the Bible in it’s many variations and I have found all the Holy books pretty much say the same things. I’ve even read the recently found Gospel of Thomas. I have learned that God, is the Father Almighty, creator of heaven and earth, and in his only son Jesus Christ who was conceived of the Holy Spirit and born unto a virgin woman, Marion (or Mary). What were the alignment of starts and planets that said Marion you will now be -- it is now your turn to experience life; furthermore, what was it that had her destined to be the mother of Jesus Christ. Are we predestined to live out a certain existence or do we have a real choice in the matter when it’s our turn to come up to bat, and live out our life. I’ve read scientific books like Carl Sagan’s “The Dragons of Eden” which documents the evolution of not only man but more specifically the evolution of man’s mind from a fish like brain, based more on basic instinct, to a reptilian brain, based more on aggression, to a mammalian brain, and eventually to the brain we have today which is a combination of all the previous brains used. We never lost the fish brain or reptilian brain we simply evolved with them. On top of the two sub-brains is a larger more complex brain, but how and why and why just us humans. I’ve read Isaac Asimov’s “The Story of Origins of Mankind, Life, the Earth, and the Universe” and got a sense that we humans, Homo-Sapiens, the only surviving human species, haven’t been in existence as long as the Earth is old and we are merely a quick flash in the pan when it comes to our time on Earth. Then what was that spark that said humans, Homo-Sapiens, you will now be; it is your turn for existence. Which is it? You either have to go off of faith and believe something most people find intangible and that mankind was brought into being by God The Father Almighty or you have to go off of the evolution of mankind and to be honest, and hopefully not sound blasphemous, it’s hard to go off of a faith with no tangible evidence for the beginnings of mankind other than what was written down by many men and perhaps even a woman. It’s an interesting dilemma because if we go off of faith we believe there is a higher power greater than us that brought us into existence, a God weather in the Christian view of the Trinity of Father, Son, Holy Spirit or Islam’s one God, or Asia’s one God the living Buddha. Or, if we see our selves as somehow, through evolution, evolved into existence then we Humans place ourselves in the seat of God. With no God in heaven that created us, we somehow created ourselves -- we are the gods of our own existence. There can’t be an in between; it’s either there is a God who created us or we were our own God and created ourselves. The other question that rises is that I can see if we were only flesh how we could have come about in some primordial ocean and evolved into a more and more complex life systems, but there is clearly a spirit that dwells within us that seems to be completely detached from the fleshly body. In a way we are kind of like the Holy Trinity of God because we exist in mind, body, and spirit -- the three work together to make us who we are, and all three must be present for us to be in existence. The mind or psyche is clearly independent of the body -- it will still function even if the body becomes paralyzed, the spirit still remains intact even if we lose a limb, and the fleshly body allows our spirit to see, touch, taste, and smell the world. It’s as if evolution created first this very complex joining of a mind -- with the ability to live out our own destiny and have critical thinking -- a body which allows us to experience the worldly things, and a spirit that is the essence who we are -- without it we would simply be flesh much like a tomato picked from a vine. If we did have the ability to create ourselves from such a complex structure system, I would say that definitely makes us gods. If we are the gods that created ourselves and brought ourselves into existence where did we get the blueprint from, what tiny prehistoric ball of protein thought for itself and said this is how we will experience life. I’m not sure if Carl Sagan believed in God or not, but I do remember him saying we are the stuff of stardust -- it is what we are formed of. Our flesh is made up of the same elements that can be found in the Universe and our blood chemistry is the same as ocean water; consequently, he further added that life and the human experience is simply only the Universe trying to experience itself. The philosopher Depak Choprah said the same thing. Wouldn’t that idea make the Universe the god and in turn, we being the universe experiencing itself, also the god. Was it prehistoric man trying to fathom existence and brought about a God or gods. I remember a story about some westerners who went into the heart of the Amazon and made contact with villagers who never learned any western ideas, religions, medicines, etc. The westerner was speaking about a man who was sick in the village and tried to explain that the man was sick because he drank contaminated water and the organisms in the water got into his blood stream, and digestive system causing him to become sick. The Amazon Indian witch doctor looked at him and could not comprehend what the westerner was saying. The witch doctor explained to the westerner. He said the man had went down to the river, and drank from it, and had acquired bad spirits. The bad spirits were possessing his body and it would take some time before the spirits decided to leave him. It’s interesting that both the Amazon Indian and the westerner both were really saying the same things with different views on life. The witch doctor was educated in his own ways and the westerner was educated in his own ways, but both really knew that the man was sick because he ingested something: The westerner called it an organism, and the Amazonian witch doctor called it a evil spirit. Who is right? They both are. They simply have different names for the same cause of the man’s ailment. Could it be the first man to contemplate and ponder on the ideas of where he came from may have known that we did in fact come from stardust, from the Universe, and a maybe someone like a westerner came along and named that Universe Heaven and the stardust that created us he named God. Is the Bible simply a collection of songs, soliloquies, metaphors, similes, and poems written by man to try and make sense and give to the Universe, that created us, a name. In a way we do act as gods. We are in control of our destiny, we create civilizations, we control the growth of and alter the DNA of vegetables and animals to soot ourselves. We can even create life and make clones of life -- as if we are playing with life. No other living species on the planet has the ability to do this. Of all the living species on the planet, humans are the only species that seems to know it has a beginning and an end -- a death -- or at least in the physical because weather you have faith in a God or believe we are the creation of the universe itself, we don’t really die we either return back to dust -- stardust -- and our spirit returns back to God or it returns back to the universe. If my existence is merely only a dream then who is the director of this dream. Am I the dream director -- the Universe -- trying to experience itself or, if this is life as we believe it to be, who is the creator. Clearly we did not get here alone or by ourselves. And if it is the universe which has no beginning or end, much like God, why did it now choose to experience life, and because we do act like gods, we can not be predestined to live out a life like a puppet on strings. We have a spirit, a mind, and a body that directs our direction in life as well as gives life. I gather that to understand what life is, why we are here, and get a greater sense of our destiny, reading the Holy books is the best way to get a better understanding of such questions. Reading biology books and books on evolution only tell us how we came about, but they don’t answer the questions of what our purpose is, or why we came into existence in the first place. I think of the evolutionary books as the principles of life, but the Holy books as the fundamentals to why there is life.
Garden of Eden
In reading the Holy Bible we begin with Genesis which gives an account to the creation of life and life for Adam in the Garden of Eden. Is this garden of Eden a metaphor or did it really exist. It is said that God was lonely and created Adam from the clay of the Earth -- stardust -- and Adam lived in the Garden of Eden -- a place I imagine was like heaven on Earth. Adam did not have any worries; everything he could ever need was provided to him. He lived in peace, in harmony amongst the many creatures and plants that God had created before him; furthermore, Adam had a job to name all the animals and plants in this garden. It was as if Adam was set out to live like a god in the Garden of Eden and rule over and care for all the plants and animals. Is this what is meant when it is said that we were created in his image. We function similarly, but one of the only differences that God and Adam had was that Adam did not know good from evil. God, making Adam in his image also gave him emotions much like God’s own: to love, and to be lonely. God realized that Adam needed a mate and created Eve from Adam’s side. Is this a metaphor for the creation and evolution of life. Whatever that first protein chain was that decided it wanted to experience life had to also create life for itself and created a mate to ingeniously trade off genetic information to further evolve into more advanced and complex creatures. It’s as if this single cell protein chain had a blueprint in mind of how it would create life -- where did this ball of protein, single celled organism, yet with the ability to think, come from and how was it so intelligent to create an entire world of life. If it is not a metaphor and Adam truly did walk with God in the garden and lived in peace and harmony with all the animals then it wasn’t until the temptation of the serpent at the tree of knowledge of good and evil that truly changed Adam and his partner Eve’s perception of life. I’m sure they did not even contemplate death -- they had no need to. They were to live forever in the Garden of Eden. In Genesis 2: 17 God says, “ but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die.” But Adam and Eve ate of the forbidden fruit, and they believed at that moment in time as the Bible said Genesis 3:4 says, "You will not surely die," the serpent said to the woman.” But, God said you shall surely die, so Lucifer lied to Adam and Eve. After they had eaten of the forbidden fruit from the tree of knowledge, God said behold they have become like one of us, knowing both good and evil. God must have surely known at this point that the flesh, after eating from the tree of knowledge, could not resist other temptations or chose to always follow right over wrong. Adam and Eve, as God said, they have become like one us. What was God saying and who was God referring to when he said “us.” Was God referring to the Angels and Lucifer with his fallen angels, or was God referring to himself in the Trinity of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. I believe, if this historical record is not simply a metaphor, then God was referring to Himself, in the Holy Trinity. But, if this story is a metaphor it seems that as humans evolved they became less connected to the symbolic Garden of Eden -- the animal kingdom. Just like the Amazonian witch doctor trying to give reason for why the villager got sick could it be that the Garden of Eden was written after man had became less of an animal, with basic instincts, and no knowledge of life and death, nor any concept of good and evil. If man lived as an animal then this would make sense, because the only reason for doing something to harm another living thing would be for survival sake, much like lions, and wolves. The wolf knows no evil it is only living out its existence through its basic instincts for survival. Could it be that we being banished from the Garden of Eden is really a metaphor for losing our place in the animal kingdom. Once we no longer operated off of basic instincts, much like the animals, and had emotions of love, hate, sadness, and knew the difference between good and evil we became like the gods of the jungle rather than simply other inhabitants of the jungle. We could no longer be in the same realm as the animals, in a sense losing our connection to the Garden of Eden -- the Animal Kingdom -- and with the ability to no longer operate off of basic instinct, but could now think about life, how we would live life, what our personal destiny would be. We no longer were apart of the Garden or Animal Kingdom but raised above it and became like what the Bible says God said, “They have become like one of us.” We had become like God. But what exactly did that mean to become like one of us. We ate from the tree of knowledge and now operated off of more than basic instinct. We immediately knew we were naked and ran to cover ourselves. No animal realizes that it is naked and runs in shame to cover itself; I’m sure it never crosses their mind. But God also said we were created in his image and that God is all around us. Why would God create us first as animals much like apes which we know carry a DNA that is 99% similar to ours. Why would God create us first as animals and then say I have created you in my image. Could the image God referred to be of the Trinity in the Son, Jesus Christ. If God had always existed -- much like the universe -- with no beginning and no end then Jesus was not exactly created. Sure, He was born to a virgin, but He was in fact God come to Earth. God in Jesus Christ, whom I would have to believe always existed in the Trinity. Why do I believe this because when Jesus was crucified on the cross he looked up to heaven and said Father why have you forsaken me. Jesus had never been separated from God and the Holy Spirit and asked why he was alone at this horrible moment. Jesus was the God of the Trinity who walked in the garden with Adam and Adam was also created in Jesus image; furthermore if science and the bible were to ever to agree then God is all around us. Just like the Amazonian witch doctor trying to explain in simple terms why the villager was sick. Maybe the Bible was using God as a metaphor in saying every element from the periodic table of elements that can be found in the Universe, and makes up the Universe, also makes up who we are. We are the stardust, the elements of the Earth, Air, Water, etc. And, if we were created in Jesus image and Jesus is flesh and bone, well, the flesh we are made up of comes from what scientist refer to as stardust. We are made up of the same things that are in our surroundings. Just about all the elements on the element table practically make up who we are and those same elements can be found throughout our environment. So, if we are created in God’s -- Jesus -- image then the Earth and the Universe all around us is also apart of Jesus; Jesus -- God -- is in fact everywhere; pieces of who we are are all around us. But what made us different from the animals. We know Elephants do greave, we also know Elephants are very intelligent animals, do appear to love and have family bonds, and apparently know what death is. Elephants will take the bones of their families to a special place -- call it the bone yard -- but it is essentially an Elephant cemetery which the Elephants visit every so often, and they seem to know whose bones belonged to what fallen Elephant and greave over their loss. So, what makes us different from the animals when the elephant is emotionally much just like us? What caused us to lose our connection to the metaphorical Garden of Eden -- the animal kingdom? God said, “They have become like one of us.” Although Elephants are intelligent, have the ability to love, have family bonds, and greave and know death, and acquire knowledge through an incredible memory, what makes us different is that we know of both good and evil not just basic instincts and have the ability to act on one over the other. If you believe in evolution then you would know that unlike animals we can make a choice we are no longer governed by basic instincts, but if you have faith in God then we have always had this ability to make choices; nonetheless, both outlooks are saying the same thing and it is this knowledge of good and evil that separates us from the Animal Kingdom and puts us above the animals.
How do we experience life
One thing is certain we experience life much differently than animals. While animals survive off of basic instinct and can somewhat be predictable, humans experience life in an expression of arts and humanities. We are creative, as if the spirit part of ourselves is trying to express itself. For instance, we write beautiful, heart touching, loving and passionate poems, essays and novels for the reader to ponder, we create song and passionate dance in a celebration of life. Trying to find meaning behind life we come up with thought provoking philosophies, we love passionately like no animal can and on the same hand we also hate like no animal can -- a downside of eating from the tree of knowledge. However we came into existence is clearly a gift and the greatest emotion, yet most complex emotion, that evolution, the Universe, or God could have given us is love. Why would evolution need to give us this emotion, why would the Universe need to give us this emotion. To say it was given to us so we would procreate is not true, because animals do not have to be in love to procreate. This is one of those things that evolutionist and scientist cannot honestly make sense of, but when we think of being created in God’s image it’s easy to understand why we love the way we do. I used to think, weather a fluke of nature of not, that the greatest gift given to us weather from the universe, evolution, or God (and it is most likely God) was the gift of life, but what is life if our emotions are ruled by hate, anger, and sadness -- life becomes pointless. What’s the point of living life if it is only sorrowful and full of hate. Too bad we ate from the tree of knowledge because we could have possibly been totally captivated by love with no hate or sadness. Here is where God can be the only answer for this emotion. If my essay started to sound like I didn’t believe in God, here is one of many areas where I surely can’t disprove him or say he does not exist. There is just no other logical reason to have this emotion; for it is written that God is love, and the greatest gift God could have given us was not actually life, but the ability to love like He does. In knowing this it’s easy to understand when a man or woman becomes jealous of his or her husband or wife if they suspect they are having feelings of love for another person outside of their marriage. For the love of a husband or wife is meant for the husband or wife, they don’t want to share that love. I also understand, if there is a God, why He gets so jealous when we love things more than Him. It’s for the same reason a husband or wife get jealous when her husband or his wife loves someone more than them; furthermore, I get why the husband or wife gets so furious when they find out when their husband or wife is loving someone more than them. God has this same emotion. In Exodus 20: 1-6 1 And God spoke all these words: 2 "I am the Lord your God….. 3 "You shall have no other gods before me. 4 "You shall not make for yourself an idol in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, 6 but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments.How furious and jealous God becomes when we love things more than him that his anger carries over for generations, but when we genuinely love Him, He shares his love which is so great that it carries over to a thousand generations. Love is the emotion we feel when we write passionate poems, great novels, it’s the passion of love that causes us to create beautiful works of art like the Mona Lisa. This is something animals don’t possess. Why would the Universe or evolution need to cause us to evolve with this emotion -- it just doesn’t make sense. Love is God, and it’s a very complex emotion and is the only sane and satisfactory answer to the problems of human existence, and it’s God that explains this to us. The Bible is basically a book about love: love of neighbor, love of enemy, love of wife, love of children, love of parents, love of life, and of course love of God, who is a jealous God. There is no reason for the Universe to give us this emotion, nor is there any reason for evolution to cause us to evolve into having such a powerful and complex emotion. Again, a loving God -- of whom we were created in the image of -- is the only logical reason for us to have this emotion.
Why Death
But why does God give us such a brief life and then take it away or why does the Universe only allow us such a brief glimpse of life and then take it back. You would think if the Universe -- which has no beginning or ending -- decided to experience itself that it would keep that life around as long as it is old. But it is more logical to believe that God has set the boundaries. Because of sin there is the punishment of death that we can not escape from it. In Deuteronomy 30: 15-20 God said, “15 See, I set before you today life and prosperity, death and destruction. 16 For I command you today to love the Lord your God, to walk in his ways, and to keep his commands, decrees and laws; then you will live and increase, and the Lord your God will bless you in the land you are entering to possess. 17 But if your heart turns away and you are not obedient, and if you are drawn away to bow down to other gods and worship them, 18 I declare to you this day that you will certainly be destroyed……This day I call heaven and earth as witnesses against you that I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your children may live 20 and that you may love the Lord your God, listen to his voice, and hold fast to him. For the Lord is your life. The Lord is your life. Sounds like the Lord, God Father All mighty is the life-line to eternal life. There is no other logical reason for death other than a power greater than us is using it at a punishment for sin. Logically, if the Universe wanted to experience life it would have made more sense to keep life going and not ending it. The Bible says the punishment for sin is death. Evolutionist and scientist say that there is a gene that triggers our bodies to begin the process of aging, and then dying, but what is the logical reason for this if the Universe wants to experience life. It just doesn’t make sense for the universe to bring itself into existence and then end it, but what does make sense is that it has to be a punishment. The gift of life, such a wonderful gift, as punishment is taken away due to sin. If only we didn’t eat from the tree of knowledge and were able to love one another the way God had planned for it to be. I can imagine a world with love, without hate and destruction, but I can’t see it to come to pass by man alone, because we are corrupt with sin and seek to satisfy the flesh rather than the spirit that constantly guides us to do what is right. So, what is exactly death, this punishment handed down by God. It is a myth that when we die we ascend into heaven. We do not God said when you die it is as if you are sleep and will not be awakened until Jesus returns to raise the dead from the grave and judge them according to their works. But what does this mean exactly? It sounds that the body dies and the spirit sleeps. The spirit does not die, but then what is the point of hell.
What is the point of HELL
What is hell? Eventually just about everyone will ask this question. It doesn't matter if you are an evolutionist, atheist, spiritualist or which religion you worship under. Many may deny that it even exist. I agree that a person must have faith in order to believe in Hell. As Christians, Jews and Muslims we somewhat have a shared idea of what heaven is and who will be there, but we don't really have a good understanding of what hell is and why God made such a horrible place. We are taught it's not a place we would want to go. Why did God make such a place where people would be tormented forever, what's the point? Ministers and Priest talk about the beast with six heads, the antichrist, and the mark of the best, 666, and ultimately they talk about hell. The entire Bible would be a lie if hell didn't really exist. But again, hell could be a metaphor for a life lived in sin; additionally, we create our own hell, while experiencing life, by sinning. Sinning corrupts the spirit and causes us great depression, grief, turmoil -- we create our own hell. I know that when Jesus Christ was crucified and died on the cross, He descended into hell. In Acts 2, Peter said in verse 31, " He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in HELL." When Jesus Christ died His soul descended into hell. That would make hell a real place. I'll be the first to tell you that I fear hell, Lucifer and his dark angels. I don't want any parts of his kingdom. The Bible says that when we die we are totally unconscious until Jesus comes and resurrects us from our graves and according to the Bible it is not possible for a dead relative to talk to us because they are totally unconscious. The Bible says, we are conscious of nothing. So, who are we communicating with when we see apparitions of our dead relatives. Is it that the spirit did not die like the body and we are still able to live through the spirit, but that would make the Bible a lie. We, the essence of who we really are, our spirit, is totally unconscious as if it were sleep. So, the only spirit that could be talking to us pretending to be our dead relatives would have to be angels, but not just any angels, the fallen angels that dwell on this Earth with us.
Conclusion
The prayer “Our Father” given to us by Jesus gives me an idea of how God wanted his creation to turn out when he created the Garden of Eden. It says, Our Father who are in heaven, holloweth be thy name. Thy kingdom come, thy will be done, on Earth as it is in Heaven, give us this day our daily bread and forgive us of our trespasses as you forgive those who trespass against us (love your neighbor, love your enemy, love everyone as God loves you) and lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil (deliverance from evil brings eternal life). Amen. So, why am I here? Is this only a dream or I’m actually here. How did I get here. What was it that determined that it was my time to be here. I know that I exist. I feel that I am alive, but where is here and why am I here, now. What were that alignment of planets that said you will now be; Joseph it is now your turn to exist. Albert Einstein, one of the greatest minds of the twentieth century, said, “There is absolutely no other logical answer for the beginnings of life than that it came from a creator greater than us.” This is not a dream -- it can’t be -- because I can alter and change my dream to suit what I need for the outcome to be, and it’s not possible that some primordial ball of protein thought all this up: how can some primordial ball of protein have set the blueprint for life as complex as this. How could some primordial ball of protein create humans who are so creative and with dreams, and the ability to love like no other creature. There is a God. This is not a dream. I understand why I am here. God created me in His image and made me from the same elements that make up the Universe; consequently God is everywhere because those same elements that make up who I am, make up God of whose image I was created in. God is everywhere because He shared himself. The only thing that ever existed before Earth and Heaven was God. No Universe, no planets, no Heaven. God gave a piece of Himself to make the Heavens, the Universe, and all the life found on Earth, and I am here -- I’m am here right now -- to love Him in return, love honor and respect His creation, to love passionately, and to love my life and use it to further cause people to love Him and each other.
THIS PIECE IS NOT YET DONE --It is only in rough draft -- AND IS CURRENTLY IN THE WORKS FOR COMPLETION 7月3日 Blacks and the BluesBy Joseph T. Evans
If you’d like to gain an better understanding and appreciation of the richness, complexity, and depth of African-American culture in relation to the broader American culture, listen to America's music. America's musical art form owes it's beginnings to the African-Americans. The blues, the precursor to rock 'n roll and several other genres of music, are an expression - even a chronicle - of the lives of people who had at one time been slaves. Music, of course, is only one of the many African-American contributions to the American society, but it is an important contribution, because not only did it set the foundation for Americas culture and identity, African-American music shed light on the ideas, values, and emotions -- as it continues to do today -- of many otherwise silent African Americans.
Initially, Blues lyrics developed in the Delta regions of Mississippi as slaves sang while working on the plantation fields, and frequently made reference to escaping the hard and unforgiving life of the cotton fields in search of a better life. The Blues as sang by the plantation slave had hidden messages confined to the communities where blacks joined each other for a culture wholly different from what was seen and heard by the white community.
The style of music, as sang by the plantation slaves, got it’s start from field hollers and calls; additionally, like most African-American music, the evolution of the blues provided insight into the changes that took place in the lives of African-Americans after slavery had ended. Prior to Blues, African American song consisted of field hollers and calls, which served as a means of communication among plantation workers. While field hollers had elements of personalized song, they had never truly developed as solo songs.
Field hollers were work songs that evolved out of the call-and-response work songs that had set the pace for work gang labor on antebellum slave plantations. This same style of music could also be seen by black prison chain gangs working on the roads in the south. In fact the two go hand in hand. The slave hollers and prison chain-gang workers were filled with words telling of their extreme suffering. The blues were notable for their profound despair. They gave voice to the mood of alienation that prevailed in the construction camps of the South. In the Mississippi Delta that blacks were often forcibly conscripted to work on the levee and land-clearing crews, where they were often abused and then tossed aside or worked to death.
Despite the blues uniqueness from field hollers and prison chain gangs, it was forged from the same musical repertory and traditions. The call and response form of expression remained, but instead of incorporating a response from other participants, the blues singer responded to himself or herself usually with his or her guitar, harmonica, or piano. Thus, it was not created from a new type of music, but from a new perception about oneself.
As African-Americans regained some form of freedom in America, the blues slowly changed from expressions of personal hardship to a greater emphasis on male-female relationships, and the need for commercial success in the larger cities. The blues are much more than entertaining songs. They offer a chronicle of the lives of African-Americans over the past century.
After African-Americans slaves acquired freedom, blues music reflected that new status, Booker T. Washington’s teachings, and the Horatio Alger model, which asserted that the individual molds his own identity and destiny, influenced this form of personalized music. According to Lawrence Levine, "there was a direct relationship between the national ideological emphasis upon the individual, the popularity of Booker T. Washington's teachings, and the rise of Blues music. Psychologically, socially, and economically, Negroes were being acculturated in a way that would have been impossible during slavery, and it is hardly surprising that their secular music reflected this as much as their religious Negro Spirituals and Gospel music did." As a consequence, it was the emphasis on the individual that influenced the blues personalized form of song.
The blues once it went main-stream, traditionally were first sung by men at leisure and was called folk blues. Some folk blues singers sung in medicine shows and touring carnivals. As black vaudeville singers came in contact with country singers, they eventually learned to sing the blues. Vaudeville singers brought a professional quality to the music and constructed the foundation for the Classic Blues that we know today.
The blues lyrics began to become a music that was not simply a music of sadness, but encompassed a wide range of emotions, including humor, sometimes salacious and sometimes ironic. Blues lyrics contain some of the most fantastically penetrating autobiographical and revealing statements in the Western musical tradition. Blues lyrics were often intensely personal, frequently contain sexual references and often deal with the pain of betrayal, desertion, and unrequited love or with unhappy situations such as being jobless, hungry, broke, away from home, lonely, or downhearted because of an unfaithful lover. In effect, blues musicians were informal chroniclers of the African-American condition and history. Whether a specific blues spoke strictly in personal terms or broached larger social issues, the genre gave voice to black aspirations and experiences.
The blues took very different forms in different regions of the United States. Musicologists divide the blues into the Delta blues - generally thought to be the source of the art form – the Piedmont blues, from the areas east from Georgia into the Carolinas and the Texas blues.
The blues emerged in three relatively isolated regions heavily populated by African-Americans — the Mississippi Delta, the Piedmont, and East Texas. Guitarists Charley Patton, Robert Johnson, and Son House exemplified the Delta blues style. The Delta style featured slide guitar playing, in which the musician made use of a hard, smooth object such as a closed pocketknife or long glass bottleneck worn on a finger of the left (chord playing) hand. By sliding the knife or bottleneck up and down the strings, the guitarist could bend notes and create distinctive, singing phrases.
In the Piedmont, the hilly upland extending from Virginia through the Carolinas all the way to Georgia, blues musicians such as Josh White (1908-1969) developed a sophisticated finger-picking technique that allowed them to play light and lyrical guitar accompaniments to blues vocals.
East Texas blues, which also included parts of Louisiana, was rhythmic and driving, as seen in the playing of guitarists Leadbelly and Sam "Lightnin'" Hopkins. But New Orleans did not develop into an important blues center until much later, perhaps due to its tradition of marching bands, riverboat bands, and — among the Creole population — formal schooling in music. The blues also exerted relatively little influence on early New Orleans jazz, which was more a product of ragtime and marching bands. There was also a strong piano tradition in the blues, emerging during the early 20th century out of the pine-country timber camps of Georgia and the Carolinas; from countless jook joints scattered across Florida, Mississippi, and Texas; and from the honky-tonks of Chicago. This style of playing, with its repetitive, rolling bass patterns, was popularized in the 1930s as boogie-woogie, but its origins were considerably older.
The Great African-American Migration from the south to the North and out West spread blues throughout not only the black South, where for many years the blues remained little known to the rest of the nation. All that changed in the 1910s and 1920s with the rise of the recording industry and the start of the Great African-American Migration. In the Great Migration, massive numbers of African-Americans left the South for the cities of the North and the West Coast. Between the 1940s and the 1960s, the movement rose to a flood. In making the move, African Americans carried the blues along, and generally speaking, the musical movement followed regional lines. Piedmont blues musicians generally headed up the eastern seaboard with many, like Josh White, ending up in Harlem, New York. East Texas-style players moved west and formed what would be called West-Coast Blues as sang by Bonnie Rait, and considerably the most important line of movement was that from the Mississippi Delta to Chicago, a route taken by such musicians as Broonzy and guitarist Muddy Waters.
The Classic Blues style was popular among newly arrived African-Americans in the cities. The migration of many blacks to the cities gave them a new freedom from the church and community that had not been experienced in the rural areas. Blacks demanded entertainment, and black theaters, dance halls, and clubs were opened. Women stopped singing in their churches and began to perform in theaters, clubs, and dance halls.
The blues entered the forefront in the 1920‘s, with Mamie Smith's recording of "Crazy Blues" and "It's Right Here for You". The record sold for a dollar and 75,000 records were sold in only a month. The songs were very popular and opened the doors to other blues singers. The market for the recorded blues was almost entirely black during the 1920s and 1930s, and the records became known as "race records." Record companies advertised exclusively to blacks and only black stores sold the records, but as a result of Mamie Smith's success, white record companies seized the opportunity to make a profit in the new market. Companies searched for talented blues artists, and singers such as Bessie Smith, Ma Rainey, Alberta Hunter, and Ethel Waters, became popular blues artists.
The popularity of the blues brought about a new era for black music. It combined the styles of the past with a new type of song. The result was the creation of a style of music that would eventually contribute to the development of and spin off of jazz, Bee-Bop, and eventually Hip-hop, but Blues is also known for being the foundation for Rock ‘n Roll. As the song sang by Muddy Waters states, “The Blues got pregnant, and the Blues had a baby, and they named the baby Rock ‘n Roll.” From blues music came great artists, such as Jimmy Reed, Muddy Waters, John Lee Hooker, Koko Taylor, Howlin’ Wolf and BB King.
Over the years jazz gradually moved away from the blues. When big-bands gained national popularity during the swing era of the 1930s, they mainly played dance music and pop tunes rather than the blues, although Count Basie's big-band was one notable exception to this trend and through the playing of Chuck Berry and Bo Diddley, Chicago blues had a shaping influence on 1950s rock 'n' roll.
The Blues, at one time, was thought to be a dieing art form until the revival in the 1980’s brought about by the late Stevie Ray Vaughn, of whom Blues innovator John Lee Hooker called the world’s best Blues Guitarist and singer, ever. Today the Blues can still be heard by Blues greats such as Buddy Guy, B. B. King , Eric Clapton, Koko Taylor, Taj Mahal, and Bonnie Rait, and newer groups such as the fast harmonica playing group, Blues Traveler.
Although considered Rock ‘n Roll when sung by white entertainers or Southern Rock as played today by artist such as Lynard Skynard, the Allman Brothers, and ZZ Top, American rock ‘n roll does in fact come from an influence of Blues music which could be heard in the music of Janis Joplin, and Jimi Hendrix. The fact is that blues, a uniquely African-American art form, never died but only evolved as a music, and has set the foundation for all popular forms of American music as played today. It is in my opinion, and in my opinion only, that all pure American Rock ‘n Roll is actually Blues derived, and true Rock ‘n Roll came from Great Britton with groups like the Beetles, the Rolling Stones, and Elton John but that‘s a different story.
SEE ALSO ESSAY: I too know why a caged bird sings. 7月1日 Soliloquy of my loveBy Joseph T. Evans Loving a woman is such a complex emotion for me because unlike anger, which I can pinpoint down to its root cause -- and when I concentrate hard enough I can actually shake it off. It’s not even like sadness, which just like anger, I can pinpoint down to its root cause and most of the times I can get over it fairly quickly and shake it off, too. Both anger and sadness seem to stay in the realm of logic and reason; I'm able to think about what’s happening to me logically and get over it and most of the times never think about it again. But, love -- it's such a powerful and complex emotion -- can not be turned on and off nor pinpointed down to its root cause nor easily gotten over when it ends. I've tried to use logic and reason before to deal with love, but it seems love -- unlike anger and sadness does not seem to stay within the same realm of logic and reason. When it comes to love -- logic goes out the window. It's amazing how love makes me feel; I feel like I've been drugged and have developed a chemical addiction and I can’t kick the addiction no matter how hard I might try. When I am away from her I feel as if I'm going through chemical withdrawals. Maybe it’s so hard for me to understand this emotion of being in love or falling in love because it is a gift from God Himself and I can’t understand the perplexities of God. I've tried to understand the perplexities of God and they are just too deep for me to fathom. I barely know how and why I fall in love let alone the perplexities of God.
I recall reading a bible verse where God said leave your parents and cleave unto your wife and the two shall become as one. Was God being literal when He said this? What exactly was God saying? I think I just might understand what God was saying. In that statement I understand why the love I have for a woman is so vastly different than the love I have for, say, my mother or sister. It’s love, but the love I have for a woman seems so much more of a binding type of love as if the two have become as one. Maybe that’s just it, the becoming of one and binding are the two souls becoming joined, and it is that feeling of euphoria that comes over me when hers and my soul have become as one and it's through that connection that I physical feel the butterflies in my stomach and feel like I'm in sort of a voodoo trance or have been drugged with some love elixir.
That voodoo trance or feeling like I've been drugged by some love elixir causes me to me totally captivated by her; I'm in awe when I am in her presence, and I feel ecstatic whenever I am near her - she makes me smile just because she is close to me. She makes me want to be a better person, just for her sake. I get this deep yearning of wanting to romance her with flowers, love notes, sweat kisses, and intimate dinning. When I find myself in love -- caught up in this powerful and complex emotion -- I have this feeling that she completes me as a person and I don’t want to sever that tie because now I know what it is like to feel complete -- hers and my souls have joined as one. Although it does seems strange, I feel like the sun seems to rise in her eyes and when I'm looking into her eyes I see the real her that is not covered up by all societies rituals and customs. I see deep down to her soul and see her for who she truly is, and her soul seems to calm me and I feel that all is right in the world and nothing else seems to matter. By seeing deep down into her soul I get to know this beautiful woman like no one else has. I want to hang on to her every word she speaks because I want to take her all in and the sound of her voice is like music to my ears and I'm able to listen to every single note as if listening to some great classical music piece created by some great composer. And so much like an addiction, I want her to be the touch I feel and the face I see before going to sleep and the eyes I see when I awake and I love her more than life itself -- I would die for this drug -- this powerful emotion called love. I want to take this drug in constantly and become totally enthralled by her and want to be in her arms forever and caressed up to her chest just for the sake of intimacy and to feel her heartbeat against my chest. I find -- in that joining of the souls -- that I'm able to know her dreams and she's able to know mine. In my dreams I see her, I feel her, I even smell her; we are together in my dreams and in my thoughts. I even know when she is in distress even though she is far from me; it’s as if hers and my soul are communicating with each other on a level neither she nor I can comprehend.
When I am deeply in love I feel that loving a woman is hating the fact that life really is too short and even though she and I have may be together for ten, twenty, or thirty years, it’s as if those years were merely days that were just way too short and I long, even crave -- like a drug addiction -- to spend more time with her, in love. I know I'm in love when I've reached that point where I just want to love and kiss her parents in gratitude for bringing such a beautiful soul into the world. I know I'm in love when all I do is think about her. All I want to do is be with her every second of everyday and even when we fight I still want to hug, caress and kiss her all over. When I'm with her I cant stop looking at her, and when I'm not with her I can't get her off my mind and I wish she were with me. This feeling for me is more than a mental thought -- it is as if she truly is holding a piece of my heart. I know when I am deeply enthralled in love when a passionate kiss leaves me feeling dazed and momentarily confused -- stunned almost -- with a feeling of almost being lost -- I become lost in her kiss, time seems to stop, and nothing around me seems to matter, she becomes my sweet addictive fix. No cigarette or alcohol drink can come close to the feeling she brings over me.
It's just not logical nor rational these feelings and emotions I have. When in love nothing seems to matter, no sacrifices seems too big, nor no distance too great. When every time I think of her, I feel happier than the moment before. When I see her in everything I do and everywhere I go. When her love in return wraps me like a soft warm blanket. Wow, is love the greatest gift that God could have given me. I used to think the greatest gift that God could have given me was life itself, but what's life without love. Life is so meaningless when it's filled with only anger and sadness -- what's the point in living out a life filled with these two emotions. Now I see, for God is love and the greatest gift I can give back to Him is love and it is also the greatest gift I can give to another. In knowing the love of a woman, it's easy for me to understand why God has given mankind so many chances to do right, and why He gets so jealous when we love other things more than Him. I've got this epiphany that being in love, although complex, is the only sane and satisfactory answer to the problems of human existence. Is this where the saying comes from that love can concur all. Without it life is meaningless and pointless -- thank God for it and anyone fortunate enough to have it has clearly been blessed! 6月29日 Why the Caged Bird SingsBy Joseph T. Evans
When I think of the music sang and invented out of necessity from African-Americans I think of the poem by Maya Angelou, “I know why a caged bird sings.” The poem reads: A free bird leaps on the back of the wind In ancient Africa, especially the west coast of Africa, it has been noted that Africans did not write down their history but had a culture of handing down their history through stories -- by word of mouth -- much like the Aborigines of Australia, and the Polynesians of Hawaii. Grandparents would tell the parents their history, and parents would retell the history to their children, and so on and so forth. Once Africans arrived in the Americas they were forced to lose their African identity, history, beliefs, and further adding to the problem children were taken from their parents at a young age, and sold. This caused them to never know their history throught word of mouth -- the chain was broken. The Africans not having a history to guide them compensated through faith based music and sorrowful songs that depicted the Africans plight. The Africans created a new story uniquely African-American and the African slaves handed down their plight and African-American history through song: Old Negro Spirituals, Gospel music,(Holler and Call song which later became Blues), Jazz, Bee-Bop, and Hip-Hop. Some of the first songs sung by African-Americans’ ancestors were the Old Negro Spirituals and Holler and call as sang by plantation workers and prison chain gang slaves. The songs were so full of soul and although sorrowful and blue, beautiful still. You could not only hear their sorrowful plight, but the songs were sang with a fearful trill of things unknown but longed for still. The songs sang of the Africans’ plight and although they were caged and their communication stifled, they sang of freedom. It was appropriate for the Africans to sing songs of their plight and of better days to come. Africans come from a culture of handing down their history, much like the Hawaiians, through song, dance, and stories told by word of mouth. How appropriate it was that the Africans in America managed to keep this one part of their culture and hand down their history through song. Each stage of African history in America can be traced through a time-line of their musical roots. From the Old Negro Spirituals and Holler and call songs sang by slaves chained and unfree, to the gospel music they sang when they were finally imnacipated. Their voices sang loud, proud and free thanking God for letting them free. From Holler and call music, and Gospel music sprang forth several different genres of music. Jazz came from Blues (and Holler and Call songs) and you can almost still here that Old Negro Spiritual undertone in the music with songs like Billy Holiday’s, “Strange Fruit” a song sang about the plight of African Americans still. With their voices stifled through American Apartheid, no liberty, and unfair treatment. What was this strange fruit that hanged from the trees; it was the African-American ripe from death, hung from the tree, the African-American still suffering still from their plight of slavery. You can say that Old Negro Spiritual, Gospel, and especially Blues music is the historical heart of African-Americans creative soul -- their heritage -- and it sprang fourth Jazz, Soul music as sang by Aretha Franklin and Al Green, and Bee-Bop as sang by Dizzy Gillespie, and Felonius Monk. Blues music sang about the African-Americans plight and it too like the Old Negro Spiritual was sorrowful as if a cry out for liberty, for true freedom, longed for still. It wasn’t until Blues moved out of the South, from Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas. Once the music moved North to places like Chicago and New York the music changed from the sorrowful tales of a life of lingering slavery. The music turned to songs of the African-Americans plight in the urban city. While in Chicago Blues was King, in New Your Jazz and Bee Bop Ruled the charts before that Jazz and Blues were intertwined as could be heard in the Bluesy / Jazzy songs of Billy Holiday. As the old saying goes, “Blues had a baby and named it Rock ‘n Roll.” Rock music came to dominate the American culture. The music was simply Blues music sang by Anglo Americans. But the music had to be differentiated from black music and white music. With this change in perfomers the songs changed from sorrowful imagery to songs of love, casual sex, and drugs. The music started by African-Americans was sadly tainted and misconstrued as “Devil” music. If only they really knew the history. The history of Spirituals and Gospel music of faith and a concerted drive to better a nations and a people. Although the songs of African-Americans began to change, it still stayed connected with African-Americans plight in North America. From rock ’n roll came pop music as sang by Michel Jackson, and his sister Janet . It’s sad still because American humanities teachers don’t even recognize the musical contributions of African-Americans’ history -- their heritage. I have personally heard humanities teachers say that African-Americans don’t have a historical lineage of music as an artistic work, but that they only sing the music that is popular at the time. Sadly, this ignorance does not take into account that African-American music is the popular music. It’s not that African-Americans only sing the popular songs of the time, but in fact they are the innovators of the popular music of the time. If only they knew the true history: African-Americans voice has been popular since slavery. From Popular music came forth a new genre -- just as powerful as the rock in roll that preceded it and just like Bee-Bop, it hearaled from New York -- called Hip-Hop -- concidered to be the rebirth of Bee-Bop music. Hip-Hop continues to sing of the plight of African-Americans. The music was performed and eloquently expressed by Rappers such as Tupac Shakur, and Christopher Wallace, The Notorious B.I.G.. It’s as if African-Americans’ Hip-Hop music came full circle. Although the music is meant to uplift the listener and make them feel better about their condition, historically African-Americans’ music, as a whole, has never had a happy message from the sorrowful and hopeful Old Negro Spirituals to the sorrowful plight sang in Blues music. Although I choose not to listen to Hip-Hop music because it sounds of angry kids taking out their anger on society -- the music is sort of a last ditch effort on African-Americans plight -- Although sang loud and angrily, it is like the quiet riot of African-American music. But, what I find trully fascinating about Hip-Hop music is that it has come full-circle. Africans, historically did not write down their history like the Europeans did, but rather had a heritage of handing down their history in story telling. Hip-Hop, Americas’ most popular music as of today is a continuation of that, and in fact you can still faintly hear that Old Negro Spiritual, and Holler and call of the Blues in the background of the music, of crying out for freedom from their condition in America. I know too why the caged bird sings. African-Americans were so stifled from expressing themselves, that when they finally were allowed to express themselves, they sang out their plight in an over abundance, a cornucopia of talented singers and MCs that molded Americas popular culture. I know why the caged bird sings “…..with a fearful trill of things unknown but longed for still and his tune is heard on the distant hill for the caged bird sings of freedom…. But [we can not forget] a caged bird stands on the grave of dreams his shadow shouts on a nightmare scream his wings are clipped and his feet are tied so he opens his throat to sing.” 6月27日 We are "Black" Americansby Joseph T. Evans
First of all, the Institution of slavery robbed African-Americans of their history and their identity while it simultaneously established stereotypes and myths in place of their lost history and identity. This complex combination of having too little unadulterated history in addition to having much more stereotypes, projected of African-Americans, has distorted African-Americans' identity making it crucially important for the Black community to learn about their heritage, and dispel stereotypes and myths rather than uphold them as truths, not just for all of Americans and the world community, but more importantly, for African-Americans who can also get all too confused and lost in the misportrayal of African-American history and heritage.
African-American stereotypes and myths were primarily established, on the basis that the stereotypes and myths, made regarding African-Americans as less than human, easier. African-Americans were seen as savages, apes, and even the fallen angels (the American based church, The Mormons once taught that African-Americans were the fallen angels from whom God had banished from heaven along with Lucifer) cursed to be slaves, servants and forever persecuted. Further distorting history, African-Americans and other peoples of black African descent have been classified as not having made any contributions to human civilization.
Stereotypes raised fears in Americans, including the Black community, making it hard for African-Americans to vote, live in various areas of the country, obtain certain jobs, and attain higher levels of education, and because the institution of slavery did not allow African-Americans to read or write, it was extraordinarily difficult to pass on an accurate African-American history. Yet, the history African-Americans were allowed to gain knowledge of was from an Anglo-American perspective where important contributions and achievements made by African-Americans were, and are to this day, rarely touched upon. Because of the fears created by stereotypes and myths, and African-Americans history being so distorted, African-Americans were relegated to positions of non-citizens. In fact, African-Americans were so dehumanized and their history so distorted that "slavery, segregation and lynching" were considered justifiable conditions.
The same stereotypical fears that were a contributing factor to the lynching of African-Americans throughout the South are today a substantial factor to why African-Americans are horrendously brutalized by police officers, suffer lengthy, and unjust prison sentences, and even die at the hand of fellow African-Americans; therefore, to remedy this problem, the mending component is for African-Americans to know their more positive achievements, contributions, and heritage.
According to “Merriam-Webster’s” dictionary, “heritage” is: 1. Property that descends to an heir; 2. Something transmitted by or acquired from a predecessor: LEGACY, INHERITANCE, TRADITION; 3. Something possessed as a result of one’s natural situation or birth: BIRTHRIGHT.
If African-Americans’ heritage are based more on a disproportionate balance of not knowing or knowing very little African-American history, and knowing far more about the ill-portrayed media driven propaganda of the Black community, African-Americans can, and in most cases, only advance to a certain level from the previous generation, usually in a negative direction, and the crucial question becomes: How does a generation of people advance based off of stereotypical lies and a distorted identity? The only logical answer is for African-Americans to know their history and their heritage in order to build from a more positive and more accurate foundation, but what legacy do we have other than slavery, this leaves African-Americans grasping at straws trying to find an identity for themselves.
When most African-Americans are asked about their heritage, it will most likely be intertwined with southern style cuisine, the most popular music of the time, and a legacy of playing into the stereotypical roles of being uneducated, violent, or non-productive. It is good to know the history of why we eat certain foods, have a shared music, and don’t forget our past, but our birthright our heritage is far broader than what is being depicted.
According to the definition, what most African-Americans view as their heritage is not at all wrong: African-Americans inherited the “Soul” food that we eat from a heritage of our mothers and grandmothers demonstrating through food, to the family, how much they were loved, and African-Americans’ musical legacy, which some humanitarian scholars and psychologists will argue was equivalent to hearing a caged bird sing; hence, once African-Americans were freed from slavery and regained some liberty, they, as a people, after so many decades of having their voices stifled were so jubilant to be unconstrained from the tyranny of slavery that a cornucopia of soulful talent sprang fourth in blues music, jazz, bee-bop, gospel and now hip-hop. We, Black Americans, in fact established the American culture through music, but that’s a different story.
Unfortunately, due to the disproportionate balance of knowing very little unadulterated African-American history, and knowing too much stereotypical information, as if trying to grasp onto some identity, African-Americans take on the media driven images as their own identity and heritage, and or try to find their identity with Black Africans. As a result, the negative media driven images generate more negativity, and trying to find a link with Black Africans only creates frustration. The negativity can be seen in the Black community through the music, how we treat one another, and how we distort our own image of what we think it is to be Black. The distorted image of what is thought of as being Black sticks to the old stereotypical ideas of being uneducated (kept uninformed), with an attitude that prison is acceptable (kept in chains), and being a non-voter (not contributing to society).
Alex Haley, the author of “Roots,” probably not knowingly, when he traced his lineage back to Africa and found his African family, also found a huge portion of the lost history and heritage of every African-American. It was important for African-Americans to have a history beyond the negative light of slavery. African-Americans found they were not just descendents of slaves who would be relegated forever to being persecuted like heaven’s fallen angels, but had a rich pre-history of royalty, heroic warriors, loving families, and spirituality. The importance of the Black community learning of their heritage and history helps to establishes an accurate history of African-Americans and facilitates the removal of stereotypes; furthermore, the Black community in learning about their heritage, accomplishments, and contributions helps the Black community to be seen for who they truly are, highly educated, hard working, patriotic and contributing Americans with the same goals and aspirations as any other American.
Now, in saying all that, I have to say that we, African-Americans, have to realize that the history and culture we do need to appreciate is the history and culture of “Black” Americans. We are too far removed from Africa; hell, we don’t even know the names of the peoples of Africa we just call them Africans as if they were only one people.
Second of all , African-American is a term we as Black Americans chose to use to establish an identity, but we are Black Americans. When Spain tried to colonize the Americas they didn’t send over ship loads of Spanish, instead they built missions and forts and indoctrinated the Native American Indians in the ideology, customs, and faith of the Spanish people. In a sense, what the Spanish did was not bringing Spain to the new world, but instead turned the new world into Spain. This is basically what the Americans / British did to the African. They took their history, their identity, their culture, their religion, and they forced the African to assimilate into the American / European based society; losing everything that identified them with Africa and much like the Spanish acculturated the Native Americans into becoming Spanish American / British acculturated Africans into becoming Americans.
African-Americans are Americans, we are “Black” Americans and can not be anything else. Our ties with Africa were cut over 500 years ago. We are a new people with our own identity, history, and culture. So, I as an African-American, a Black American agree with most of the views of Black Africans when they say we are not African and absolutely understand why they don’t accept us as African, because we aren’t African anymore; haven’t been for centuries.
Contrast the African-American with the Native-American and it is easy to understand why we are no longer African. Historically, it is noted that thousands of years ago Native Americans came from Asia along a land bridge that formed from Russia to Alaska. The Asians crossed over the land bridge establishing a new home in the Americas. They learned to live a different way of life, developed a different diet, acquired a different history, a different culture with different customs, different language, and of course created a completely different identity for themselves. Now, the Native Americans can no more claim to be Asians and want to return to their historical homelands, no more so than we Black Americans can; furthermore, it would not make sense for Native-Americans to call themselves Asian-Americans, because they know nothing about Asia’s people, history, culture, customs, beliefs, language, and just like the Black American in relation to Africa, nor do they know which Asian group they actually came from.
We need to accept the fact that we are a different people. Although we took on the title of African-American, we are truly not. We are “Black” Americans and what Black Africans need to understand is that while they were eventually given their independence from European colonialism, we Black Americans were forced to further assimilate into the American colonial culture and society -- a society that feared us and continues to fear us. We don’t know anything other than America. So, don’t look for any resemblance of Africa in us. We in a sense are White Americans who happen to be black. Traditional Americans come in two colors white and black -- we are the same. It’s just unfortunate that we continue to live in a society that continues to stereotype us out of a fear of us, further confusing not only Black Africans, but also Black Americans. If only Black Africans really knew the contributions we’ve made to America as slaves, and more so as freed Americans. But just like I don’t know any African history, I can’t expect Black Africans to know any of my history.
What we do know of each of the other is still provided by a white, European, colonial legacy. Blacks Africans learn of Black Americans through the white ran media such as CNN, and Black Americans learn of Black Africans through the same media as well as books like National Geographic. Black Africans see Black Americans as being uneducated, lazy, all criminal minded, and talking in Ebonics, and Black Americans see Black Africans as being uneducated, tribal, no history, not able to feed themselves, nor able to properly govern themselves; in fact, we don‘t even see them as living in cities at all but in the jungle. We, both sides, both groups of people, Black Americans and Black Africans, need to realize that these are untruths and we need to learn about each other directly from the source not the white ran media driven propaganda or to be fair just from their ignorance of us.
Lastly, Black people can be found throughout all four corners of the world: Asia, Africa, Europe, and The Americas. Sure, most of Black Africans were distributed throughout the world via the slave trade, but what about the Blacks in Asia. There are Blacks in Papua New Guinea, Blacks in India, Blacks in Australia, and even the Agta -- thought to be the original inhabitants of the Philippines. They probably don’t consider themselves black since black, for some mysterious reason, equates Africans (and those in the Diaspora -- Blacks of the Americans) only. It is the same thing in Saudi Arabia and the middle east. The story is told that black people are there because they were brought there as slaves; to the contrary black people have always lived in the middle east they are the original inhabitants of the middle east.
How did Blacks get to Asia? No one truly knows, some say they are actually Asians, but they have very distinct negroid features, no Asiatic features at all. We, Black Americans and Black Africans just know they are Black people with their own identity and with no ties to Africa. Black Africans don’t expect them to know anything about Africa, because they clearly see them as a different breed of Black people; consequently, so, too are the Black Americans and the Blacks of the Caribbean. We are all Black people, but we are all clearly very different. Black Americans and Blacks from the Caribbean are even different. We have different cultures, different ceremonies, different customs, different heritages, and different language; we are different. The one and only common bond is that we are all Black people, but in saying all this a Black American is an American not an African, and an American, only. Also see essay I too know why a caged bird sings, and The History of BluesWhat is Roman Catholiciscm
By Joseph T. Evans
My religion is Christianity just like the Baptist, Presperterians, Lutherans, Greek Orthodox, and Angelicans. My denomination is the Roman and Apostolic Catholic Church. I am a practicing Catholic and proud to be a Christian Soldier for Christ through the Catholic Church. I was raised Catholic and in addition to going to Catholic schools, as a child, I was also exposed to Protestant schools and the different Protestant denominations. What I always found in the Protestant schools was that, Catholics were taught to be almost like witches who worshipped golden idols and chanted spells before an alter; additionally, Protestants had a real need to prove their religious practices of the Christian faith to be right while the Catholics teachings were all wrong. Of the three main branches of the Christian faith, Catholicism, Protestantism, and Greek Orthodox, the Protestants are the only branch of the Christian faith that seem to do this; furthermore, they only do it to the Catholics, not the Greek Orthodox or even the Angelicans of which both virtually have the same system and views as the Catholics. First off the bible warns of divisions in the Christian faith and not only do Protestants create a division between themselves and their Catholic Brethren, they also have many divisions amongst their own group of Protestants with Baptist, Pentecostal, Lutheran, Episcopalian, Methodist, Presbyterian, Jehovah’s Witness, Mormons, Seventh Day Adventist, and the list goes on. Catholics don’t teach in any way or form to have a division between themselves and the Protestants; in fact, Protestants are simply seen as the flock the left the church, just like the Angelicans and Greek Orthodox. I have to add though that the only division that the Catholic church makes against the Protestants has to do with what the Catholic church calls “sects”. The Catholic church sees the Jehovah’s Witness, Seventh Day Adventist, and Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints or Mormons as sects in the Protestant denomination, basically not true Protestants or even true Christians. They have developed their own belief structure that moves away from the teachings of the bible. Second, the Catholic churches aim has always been to try and keep Christians together as one whole united Faith without any divisions. The word “Catholic” was first used around the year 110 c.e.. It is from the Greek word Katholikos, which means whole. The word Catholic was from its inception to mean the “Church” should be one body or membership, just as it was when Jesus was alive and his followers were one. This segues into the purpose and function of the Pope and the Bishops. In Roman Catholic teachings, revelation is summed up in Christ the Lord, who commanded his Apostles to preach the gospel. The Apostles did this by “preaching” and by “example” through the institutions they established, and by spreading the teachings of the New Testament, written under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. To preserve the full and living gospel, the Apostles left Bishops as their successors, and the Pope, the head of the “Church” is simply a vicar for Christ; he is simply holding a position until Christ’s return; in fact, the apostle Peter was the first Pope of the church. I must also say it is hard to sum up a denomination that has been around for some two thousand years, but I also have to say that Catholics, a denomination of the Christian religion, don’t see a distinction between other Christians. In fact, the term “CHURCH” which I will refer to throughout this explanation, as used by Catholics includes all Christians, not just those who practice the Catholic faith. Catholics and Protestants simple have different ways of praising our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. While Protestants worship more in an extroverted manner by singing and dancing, Catholics take on a faith more introverted by worshiping through prayer and meditation. Catholics also firmly believe that during mass, God, through the Holy Spirit, is actually present; hence, the genuflection of bowing to one knee and lowering our head before being seated. It’s a sign of respect acknowledging that God is present and bow before the King of kings. At one time in Catholic history, Catholics were cautioned against private interpretations of the Bible and instead were directed toward the Catechism, a book of Catholic teachings. This caused a very definite lack of biblical familiarity among Catholics and we, Catholics, had to bow to the expertise of the Protestants when it came to quoting Bible chapter and verse, but after the reformation of the Second Vatican Council of the 1960’s, Catholic education began to focus more on scripture rather than memorizing the Catechism and an assortment of prayers. Let me also add that it is not easy to define Catholicism because it’s more of a culture or a tribe rather than just a gathering of people to worship on the Sabbath. Sacraments are the heart and soul of what it means to be Catholic. To be Catholic is to see, hear, taste, touch, and smell the presence of God. For Catholics this experience happens through the sacraments which most distinguish Catholicism from other religions and other Christian denominations. Catholics have a tradition of prayers, statues, medals, candles, incense, Holy water, and rosaries as a part of their everyday lives. As the Catholic faith has evolved over the centuries, this rich collection of sacraments has been accumulating in a history of some two thousand years and comes from many different cultures. Catholics also believe that the “CHURCH” as I said before is all of Christianity, is the continuation of Jesus’ presence through the Holy Spirit and it is also said that the Church is Christ’ bride. More about Catholic beliefs: Catholics believe in the Ten Commandments: 1. I am the Lord your God. You shall not have strange gods before me. 2. You shall not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain. 3. Keep holy the Sabbath. 4. Honor your father and your mother. 5. You shall not kill. 6. You shall not commit adultery. 7. You shall not steal. 8. You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor. 9. You shall not covet your neighbor’s spouse. 10. You shall not covet your neighbor’s goods. Catholics believe in six precepts: 1. Attend Mass on Sunday and on the six other established holy days of obligation. 2. Observe the fast days as established by the Church. 3. Confess any grave sins at least once a year. 4. Receive Communion at least once a year, preferably during the Easter season. 5. Contribute to the support of the “CHURCH” 6. Observe the Church’s laws concerning marriage. Catholics also believe in The Beatitudes which I must say lie at the heart of the Catholic teachings: Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted. Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth. Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for justice, for they shall be satisfied. Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God. Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the children of God. Blessed are those who are persecuted for the righteousness’ sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are you when people revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on My account. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you. Catholics believe in three key virtues: 1. By faith we intuitively understand that there is a God and actively seek to know and do God’s will. 2. Trough hope we desire God regardless of the circumstances of our life at any given moment. 3. Charity allows us to experience God’s love, love ourselves, and love our neighbors. And to be a “practicing” Catholic means following these principles to the best of one’s ability. The emphasis is on "practice"! The priest, bishops, Franciscans, sisters, brothers, Jesuits, and Pope all lead by "example" in "practicing" these values just like Jesus and the Apostles before them. And those who exemplify these beliefs throughout their lives we, Catholics, call Saints like Mother Teresa of Calcutta. These values can also be called traditions and Catholics believe that both the revelations within tradition as well as the Bible must be taken into account as faith directives, where as for many Protestants, the focus must be on the Scripture alone. Catholics also sum up and proclaim their faith via the Apostle’s Creed: I believe in God the Father, Creator of Heaven and Earth, and in His only Son, Jesus Christ, who was conceived of the Holy Spirit, born unto the virgin Mary, suffered under Pontius Pilot, was crucified, died and was buried. He descended into hell and on the third day He arose again from thence He has been seated at the right hand of the Father where he shall judge the living and the dead. I believe in the Holy Roman and Apostolic Catholic Church, in the communion of saints, and in life after death. Amen. Lastly, one of the biggest problems and misconceptions that Protestants have with Catholics is that Catholics are said to pray to Mary. Yes, Catholics pray the rosary which does consist of several Hail Mary‘s, but it also consist of several Our Father’s, Several Glory be to the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, and several Blessed Jesus prayers. No, Catholics do not worship Mary. Catholics are devoted to her, they venerate her, and they honor her as the mother of Jesus, but they do not worship her. Catholics only worship God in the three persons of the Trinity: The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit. Mary is revered because of her relationship with God through Jesus Christ. Catholics do not even consider her divine, and so she is not worshipped. It is my hope that whoever reads this essay comes away with a better, less altered understanding of Catholics and can understand that Catholics don’t want to be separate but apart of the whole Christian community with the same views as Protestants with just a different way of worshipping our Lord Jesus Christ. Soldier for Christ / In His service, Joseph T. Evans 6月26日 Padres and the California Mission SystemHistory of California's missions by Joseph T. Evans The missions of California stretch from San Diego in Southern California to Sonoma in Northern California. Some are State Historic Parks, while most others are still active churches; in fact, some to this day still have the Native Americans living on them that the Spaniards forced into slavery -- information that I didn't know until I researched the Internet on the subject. For years I visited the California missions on my way to or from Southern California because of my Catholic heritage, but I never truly understood why the missions were built or the history behind them. I learned the purpose of the missions was a cost effective way for Spain to further their expansion of the Spanish Empire. The padrés received no pay, and their needs were few. Moreover, their role in the conversion of the local Indians was crucial to the plan of the empire. The padrés established colonies and through education they were to transform the local Indians into civilized Spaniards and thereby into the "colonists" of their own land. The Natives were viewed as children, lost souls who needed the sacraments of God and the benefits of European civilization. In theory, each mission was a temporary institution that held all the wealth and property in the trust of the Indians. Once the Natives were appropriately civilized, the missions were to give up their stewardship of the land and create pueblos for the Indians -- Los Angeles and San José are actually pueblos (towns) set up by the Spanish. The Spanish court had learned to entrust their power to the padrés. Like others before them, many were driven and tireless men who had been assigned God's work, and no hardship, be it pestilence, hostile natives or famine, would stop the march to found missions and secure the domain of the Spanish Empire. The padrés were backed by a handful of armed soldiers that were supplied by the local presidio (fort). This partnership of the sword and the cross had proven very successful elsewhere in the Spanish Empire (especially South America) and served both equally; the crown wanted gold while the padrés wanted souls. The padrés, called Franciscan Friars, can still be found giving tours and conducting masses at some of the missions today. The Indians helped fuel the material success of the padrés' enterprise. Hundreds, sometimes up to a thousand, converts would be involved with the running of a single mission. Each convert had a quota of labor to fulfill and, in return, received sacraments, food, clothing and education. Many Indians were taught the manual skills upon which the missions would thrive. The necessary skills needed for the survival of the missions were animal husbandry, tallow making, hide and leather manufacturing, adobe brick making, and tile manufacturing. The women were taught such skills as weaving and embroidery. By entering into such agreements with the missions, however, the converts gave up their previous lives forever. Once baptized and living next to the missions in their single huts, the converts, known to the church as neophytes (literally the newly planted), belonged to the missions and their lives were totally controlled by the padrés. The padrés reluctantly released the Indians (Neophytes) even in times of near starvation. The padrés believed that releasing the Indians encouraged contact between the Neophytes and the Gentiles (the non-saved natives). If they attempted to flee, they were hunted down, and, if captured, brought back and punished. California Missions Information is an excellent site for more information on the missions and the treatment of the Indians. The site shows a sixty second movie overview of mission life with links to a detailed history of each of the twenty-one missions. What I learned that bothered me the most about the mission system was that although the Spanish system wasn't as bad and maybe not as harsh as the English Protestant's system of slavery, it was slavery. I've learned that the mission system meant different things to different groups of people. From the Indians' point of view the introduction of the missions' system meant cultural and physical genocide. From the padrés' point of view it meant lost souls brought to God and to the Spaniards it meant cheap labor in their Imperial expansion and quest for more gold and riches. Today the missions serve as churches and meeting places for everyone -- Spanish, Indian, Anglo, Asian and Black -- to meet and worship as brothers and sisters of Jesus' family. Herpetology of Amphibians as petsHerpetoculture on the web by Joseph T. Evans The hobby of herpetology has evolved into one word, herpetoculture, which means the keeping and propagation of reptiles and amphibians in a domestic setting. Reliable statistics tell us that snakes -- boas and pythons -- and lizards -- iguanas and geckos -- far outnumber frogs, toads, salamanders and other amphibians in terms of what is being kept and bred. It's unfortunate, because amphibians are much more easily kept and bred because they require less specialization; incidentally, Myth are the reasons for why amphibians haven't caught on in the same manner as reptiles. Many people believe the classic claim that touching a toad will give them warts. This is not only untrue but has given these charming animals a bad reputation. Although it may seem, judging from pet store sales, that reptiles -- snakes and lizards -- are the most popular herpetiles, Americans most beloved herpetile is actually the frog. America's favorite muppet character is Kermit D. Frog; in fact, there is a web site dedicated exclusively to Kermit D. Frog. Even those of us who don't drink alcoholic beverages have been charmed by the Budweiser Frogs. Kellog cereal's most popular children's cereal, Sugarsmacks, has a frog character on the cereal box. San Francisco's KOFY-TV 20, "The WB," has Michigan J. Frog as the network's mascot and Texas Christian University has a frog as the women's basketball team mascot. One of the first games we learn to play as young children is leap frog and almost every little girl ponders if she kisses a frog if the frog will actually turn into a prince. Frogs aren't just the most popular herpetile, but they are the most popular species of amphibians. "Amphibian" is derived from the Greek word "amphibios" which means leading a double life and amphibians truly do lead double lives. Amphibians begin their lives like fish, living in lakes and pools of water before moving on to land, but they never fully leave either environment. Many amphibians are mostly aquatic while others spend virtually all their time on land. Frogs, salamanders and caecilians must live in cool moist areas to survive. There are three types of Amphibians. Anuras (frogs and toads), caudates (salamanders and newts) and caecilians (snakelike amphibians). Anurans are characterized by traits having strong hind limbs designed for jumping, stout forelimbs, a short body and in males a vocal sac used to call the female during the breeding season. Caudates are characterized by having tails (the very meaning of the word "caudal"), cylindrical elongated bodies, and a distinct head and can be considered amphibian's version of the lizard. Caecilians, considered amphibians version of the snake, are probably the most poorly know of the amphibians. Some may get the impression that caecilians are rarely seen in the hobby, but in fact caecilians are very common. The problem is that caecilians are almost always placed with the fish rather than with the herpetiles. Their tanks are also often mislabeled as well: "fish eel," "Congo eel," "rubber eel," and I have even seen them sold as the "hosepipe fish." Fish hobbyist have probably unknowingly purchased caecilians, thinking they were adding an exotic eel to their collection, when in fact they were acquiring amphibians. Another characteristic that amphibians have is that they are able to breathe through their skin, in water and on land. This characteristic trait makes them highly vulnerable to toxins and is a reason for large numbers of species extinction. Amphibians skin acts like a sponge, sucking in air, water and nutrients or toxins. Small trace amounts of toxins in a frogs environment will cause many tadpoles to die and become deformed. Large trace amounts of toxins means death for amphibians. For this reason, frogs are indicators or alarms to a poisoned environment. Frogs are analogous to the canaries that coal miners would take into the coal mines to guard against being overcome by poisonous gases. If the canaries died, that indicated small trace amounts of poisonous gas in the mine. Small amounts of poisonous gas wasn't enough to kill the miners, but it gave the miners enough time to get out of the mine before the toxins became too high. Those that didn't notice the dead canary in time, died before they could react to the situation. There are several scientific organizations that believe frogs are the Earth's indicator and that frogs are becoming extinct at an alarming rate because of the toxins in the environment. Eventually, if we don't recognize the problem as serious, we too will become extinct. DAPTF (The Declining Amphibian Populations Task Force ) discusses more about the decline and the reasons for amphibians decline. DAPTF was established in 1991 at Open University in Britain and consist of 3,000 scientist and conservationist from around the world. DAPTF's mission is to determine the cause to the declines of amphibians throughout the world and promote ways of stopping and \ or reversing the decline. This is an excellent site for anyone who wants to learn more about the importance frogs have to our survival. Frogs just aren't similar to birds in detecting toxins in the environment but are referred to as the song birds of the night for a couple of reasons. During the day, the songs of birds fill the air of the rain forest with beautiful music and the trees with their colorful plumage of greens, yellows, reds, and blues; however, during the night, the songs of frogs fill the air of the rain forest with their beautiful music and the trees with the colors of greens, yellows, reds and blues. Frog photo gallery has photos of various frogs from the rain forest and the web site, frogs and toads, shows a colorful collection of frogs and toads native to North America. The website, frogs and toads, not only allows you to view frogs from North American, but it enables you to hear some of the songs that the frogs of North America make in their natural habitat. Facts about frogs is an excellent web site for learning more about frogs. I have acquired some of the more common pet store varieties of amphibians. My collection consist of a White's Treefrog (Kermit) -- also called a Dumpy Treefrog -- a White Lipped Treefrog (Bozo), a pair of Cuban Treefrogs (Fidel and Castro), a pair of Green Treefrogs (Verdé and Jade), four Fire-bellied Toads (they are the only toads that live in water), a Blotched Tiger Salamander (Tiger Woods) and three Fire-bellied Newts. I also own a pond in my backyard that attracts the west coast's most common frogs the Pacific Treefrogs. My amphibians have become some of the best pets that I've ever owned. Amphibians don't require as much attention as dogs, aren't as messy as cats, and are more interesting to watch than fish; furthermore, frogs croaking is so relaxing that they can literally sing you to sleep. Once more people see how beautiful and charming amphibians, especially frogs, can be and learn that the negative myths aren't true, more people will get into the hobby of amphibian herping and more people will chose to buy an amphibian over a reptile. Not only are amphibians beautiful and charming animals, but their health is important to the health of our planet and in turn to our health. Any way you look at it, you've got to love amphibians! Running for fun, health and a "Higher I.Q."Running for fun, health and knowledge by Joseph T. Evans One of the best sports on the planet is long distance running. Next to soccer, it's probably the most practiced and loved sport in the world. At some point in our lives just about all of us have enjoyed the feeling of running; in fact, most of us can remember our first enjoyable experience racing as a young child on the playground. Just about every age group, male and female, participates in the sport, each with various reasons for getting involved, but with a common tie; we have all become addicted to the sport. I never really intended to be a long distance runner, but once you begin running you become addicted to the sport and just want to run farther and longer. When I started on my very first run, I couldn't make it around the corner from my home without running out of breath and feeling like my heart was going to explode. After I went out on a couple of jogs, my muscles and especially my respiratory system soon became strong and adjusted to my pounding of the pavement. I eventually outgrew my tiny city of Pittsburg, became totally addicted to the sport and soon began signing up to run long distance races throughout Northern California. The web list thousands of websites on the sport of running and some sites allow those who want to compete to register online. I use Enter Online to register for races. It's probably one of the best and most reliable online registration websites on the web. Enter Online, list races for those who enjoy competing in running, cycling and swimming or triathlon races. The site allows competitors to register for events mostly throughout California but the site also list major marathons throughout the nation. Click on the event you want to run and the web site gives you a thorough itinerary of dates, times, cost, awards received, gifts and sometimes a detailed pictorial of the course. The Runner's Schedule, a regional magazine, list all major running events throughout Northern California and most major marathons. The Runner's Schedule isn't just an excellent magazine but an excellent website that allows competitors to register online for some events. One benefit to this web page over Enter Online's web page is that you can pull up the results of your last race by entering the race name and your first and last name. Another benefit is that the site has useful information on becoming a better runner. With the average cost of running a race costing no less that $25.00, it pays to join a runners' club. Local clubs can be found in the back of the Runner's Schedule magazine. I'm a member of the San Francisco Dolphin South End Runners Club. The club list all of its races in the Runner's Schedule. Although the East Bay has several runner's clubs, I chose to run with the "Tortoise" runners because they have more prizes, more races, and bigger and better events. The club is known for being the biggest, oldest and most successful running club in the Bay Area. Races are conveniently held on the weekend in some of San Francisco's most scenic areas. Club members pay $5.00 dollars to run a race and annual dues of $20.00. Great Running Routes is a web page for anyone who enjoys running. The site was designed for runners who occasionally want a change of scenery. Anyone who has become addicted to the sport will love this site. Great Running Routes list scenic running areas throughout the nation. This is an excellent site for those who run or jog for health, leisure or to sight see. We hear all the time that running is the best way to control weight and keep healthy. I constantly hear people say they can't lose weight because their metabolism is too slow. By running, a slow metabolism can be changed to a fast metabolism. Metabolism is the process by which the body burns fuel (carbohydrates and fats) to keep the body warm and functioning properly. Deep within the muscle fibers is where metabolism takes place. Within the muscle fibers are mitochondria. The mitochondria produce an enzyme that can be either anaerobic or aerobic. If a person never exercises, the enzyme produced is anaerobic. If the person exercises regularly, the enzyme will be aerobic. The healthier the muscle, the better the muscle burns fat to produce energy. A person who produces aerobic enzymes will burn fat even while sleeping or sitting. The body also needs oxygen to burn fat efficiently. Running builds a strong respiratory system and a fit body. A fit body produces more red blood cells to carry more oxygen to the working muscles. Oxygen is what metabolizes the carbohydrates and fats. If we decrease the oxygen to a burning fire, the fuel (wood) will burn more slowly. If we increase the oxygen to a burning fire, the fuel (wood) will burn more quickly. Our bodies burn fuel (carbohydrates and fats) in our bodies in the same manner. When you run, the higher the intensity, the more carbohydrates you burn, but when you rest -- sitting or sleeping -- the more fat you burn. This means that the healthier your muscles, the more fat you can burn immediately after exercise, and when your body is resting. A high intensity interval program, such as repeated running at 80% to 85% of maximal effort for sixty to ninety seconds, increased fat burning for up to fifteen hours after the workouts, according to a study at Laval University in Quebec. Jogging is not only good for the body but scientist believe that it helps people to think better. Scientists now believe something runners have known for a while; we're smarter. Scientist have realized that running is not only beneficial to a person's health, but it can also enhance a person's memory. Running makes a person smarter. It's true. Running before taking a test not only will relax my muscles but the extra oxygen to my brain helps my mind to be sharper. Running before studying works in the same way and even running before writing an essay. If I run before sitting down to write an essay, the ideas seem to just flow without hindrance. Runners have different reasons for running. Some run for the runner's high that all true runners speak of experiencing. I enjoy long distance running not because of being able to compete with other runners but because of being able to compete against myself. Throughout the race it's as if there are two people within me, talking to me the whole time I run the race. One personality is negative and the other is positive. The positive personality is sort of like a coach; I'm encouraged to keep running and to finish the race. The negative personality is sort of like a heckler; I'm discouraged from running and completing the race. These two personalities either talk me out of finishing the race or into completing the race. Other runners have this experience, also. In a sense, some runners run a race against themselves. If you give in to the personality that wants you to quit, then you've lost your race. You've lost the race not because you didn't beat the winner, but because you didn't beat yourself. People begin running to compete with others or against themselves, to enjoy the outdoors, to experience the runner's high or to stay fit. Runners run for different reasons but all runners gain the same benefits from the sport. Running, besides being enjoyable from the scenery and fresh air, if properly done, keeps bones healthy, blood circulating properly, the heart healthy, weight under control and the mind sharp. With all the benefits of running it's understandable why it's one of the world's greatest sports. Opinion on Book by Clifford Stoll on the invention of the InternetSilly Con Snake Oil
by Joseph T. Evans "Silicon Snake Oil" is an argument -- a whine actually -- to why the Internet is not all it's cracked up to be. In each chapter, example after example, Clifford Stoll counters each of the claims made by the media, the government, computer businesses and the public about the benefits of being online. Stoll doubts the supposed ability of the Internet to improve education, enhance library information, accelerate communication, and make research easier. "Silicon Snake Oil" is a list of every aspect that could possibly go wrong with the Internet. Stoll argues against everything the Internet has to offer, but his argument is weak. The first reason Clifford gives to the Internet being a waste of time is on how cumbersome it is to read novels over the Internet. It's true. Not too many people would want to read a lengthy novel over the Internet. As he says, "Ugh. Can't lay the laptop on my chest. A paperback might weigh ten ounces -- a pound at most -- but this thing weighs five pounds....your every suspicion is correct: it's cumbersome, clunky, ghastly slow, and mechanical." I agree reading a novel on the Internet isn't much fun but reading the newspapers from Egypt, Kenya, South Africa, London, Ontario, San Francisco and Los Angeles comes in handy and is enjoyable. Reading a novel on the computer is like listening to an organic chemistry lecture over the phone. It's possible but not too many people want to do it. Stoll also whines about the cost of the Internet and the cost of the equipment needed to get on the Internet. Well, if a person were to go to the news stand and buy one of these international papers, it could cost up to twenty to thirty dollars. Having an American Online account, depending on how many hours a person spends online, will cost less than most people's monthly phone bill, about twenty dollars per month; furthermore, I've talked to people in Japan, Los Angeles, New York, Boston, Florida, Germany and England all within the same month for several hours at a time and the cost was much less than if I did it by phone. My phone bill was only thirty dollars and my online account was only twenty dollars. My siblings and parents all live in different parts of the state and it's hard to keep in touch and it can be expensive to talk over the phone. Almost every Sunday we try to all get into our own private family chat room and talk about what's happening in our lives. It doesn't cost us anymore than the cost of the online service, twenty bucks. I say it's worth it. Education and information is the primary use of the Internet and I think it's living up to its promises. Clifford Stoll, in his argument, explains that the Internet isn't good for educating individuals. He began with children in one of his reasons. He said that children aren't able to use the Internet. Well, it could be true that there are several children who aren't able to use the Internet, but the children who I've seen enjoy it and actually catch on to it much more quickly than most adults. I do think that the Internet and the computer should be a part of children's curriculum because it exposes children to computers at an early age. It's wise to become computer literate as soon as possible because computers are everywhere. The person who understands computers will have a better chance at getting a good job. Children should be taught primarily in classrooms with other children, so that they can learn to socialize and work together with their peers. Stoll also claims that computers aren't necessary for college studies. Berkeley must really be its own country or at least Clifford Stoll is living in his own world. Computers are everywhere. Most businesses that I can think of -- banks, retail and department stores, hospitals, police departments, and 911 operators -- use computers to do something for them. College students graduating without some basic computer skills are unqualified for the real world. Not learning how to use a computer is like never learning to talk on or use the telephone or read, for that matter. It's possible but it makes life much harder and lessens a person's chances of getting a good job. Clifford mentioned that he had a bogus meter that he used to measure the amount of bogus material someone was trying to feed him. Well, I guess I have one of those bogus meters also and mine was pegged right off the scale. He mentioned a couple of statements that were just straight up bogus. He said, "[The Internet] For all its galitarian promises, whole groups of people hardly show up on the networks. Women, blacks, elderly, and the poor are all underrepresented." As an African-American, I can tell you there is plenty of information on the Internet representing African-Americans and Africans; in fact, Americans can learn more about African-American history, contributions and struggles on the Internet than they can in a high school classroom. The information is there. The user just has to look for the information like anything else. Go to Yahoo, Excite, WebCrawler, Snap, or Lycos and type in "African-American" and any of those search engines will give you thousands of web pages of information. The biggest gripe of all and the one that Stoll so called scientifically tested is in e-mail. He compares the address that the post office delivers to and the address e-mail is delivered to. He says, "Get my home address wrong and the much-maligned postal service will take a stab at delivering it....Worst case: like in the old Elvis song, it'll come back stamped, "Return to sender, address unknown." Contrast this with e-mail. Everything in the address must be typed perfectly -- no errors." There is a reason for this. First, a neighborhood street address and an address on the Internet are two totally different things. The individual who named it e-mail "address" used the wrong label. It should have been called e-mail "phone number." The e-mail address is simply a fancy phone number; hence, it reaches the receiver over the phone line. Try calling from San Francisco to New York without entering in the area code or leaving out a single digit and see what happens. You won't reach the person you want to talk to, if you get connected at all. The same problem occurs when you try to enter an e-mail address without all the characters in the string. Clifford even attacks the library system for using the computer rather than index cards. This man is weird. Computers make the system work much faster and the system much more efficient. The computers link libraries, so, if one library doesn't have the book you want, you just go to the library that does. Also, it's not that hard to learn the system used by the libraries. You just type in the book, author or subject you want to search for and press enter. It's really just that simple. The librarian doesn't have to take anyone on a one-hour tour to explain how the card index system works. The computer is very self explanatory. I believe that Clifford Stoll just doesn't want to make the change because he had to learn to do things the hard way and now wants everyone else to learn to do it the hard way, also. Stoll said, "The telephone eroded the art of writing letters. Television cut into neighborhood cinemas. MTV and superstars weakened amateur musicians and hometown bands. The car destroyed urban trolley systems; interstate highways devastated passenger rail service; and airliners wiped out passenger ships. What is most at risk from wide area networks? Our library system." Stoll must live in his own world because we still have and use all the technology and communication devices that he lists. Clifford doesn't understand how evolution works. There are two ways to view how mankind came into existence. You either believe that we got here through evolution -- we all started as monkeys and then split off into our own species, the humans -- or you can go off of faith and believe what the Bible, Koran and Torah say about our existence. If we go off of evolution, which can be traced, we find that the first known man began using tools -- a rock -- this can still be seen in our distant relatives the chimpanzees. The rock was shaped into something more > useful, a hammer, then a knife, a spear and an ax. Today we can still see the remnants of that rock. It evolved into a hammer, then a mechanical jack hammer. We no longer used the rock to build our homes, gather food, or as weapons, but as we grew so did our tool, the rock. The rock never disappeared. The rock can be seen, modified, in all our tools. When we evolved the tool -- the rock -- to do something better, it helped our society to grow and become stronger. The same is true for the Internet. The first written type of communication was called a bullae. The bullae was used in ancient Mesopotamia to help make things work a little better. The bullae was a clay ball that encased tokens. The bullae kept the middle man honest as he / she transported goods. The bullae was a credit for a promise to pay or give something to the receiver. The receiver would open the bullae and count the tokens inside. The tokens told the receiver exactly what was to be received. This method kept the middle person from taking a cut for himself while transporting the goods. This bullae system then evolved into logograms (established concepts). Asians still use logograms today. The Mesopotamians then stopped using the logograms and started inscribing, but everyone couldn't read and needed a scribe to deliver the letters. Books started to be written and then libraries began being built to hold the books. From that library -- Poor Man's University -- people learned to write and read and speak other languages. They began to contemplate the origins of the world and the universe. They began writing and publishing their works and maybe a few could understand and read the concepts. The telegraph sped up the delivery process of information. The radio sped it up even more. It became easier to communicate to a larger mass of people. The television brought it to even more masses of people. The television informed people and got more people thinking. The computer has evolved from all of our technology thus far. Everything evolved into a more useful and efficient form. The first form of writing was simply a clay ball that evolved into paper and pen, then book, library and now, the Internet. The rock went from a simple stone to a powerful metal jack hammer. The computer and in turn the Internet is the television, the radio, the telegraph, the pen and paper, communication and even the rock -- silicon and germanium -- all rolled up into one package. Nothing disappeared. Everything just got modified to be more useful and more efficient than its basic form. Our distant cousins -- the chimpanzees -- never evolved from using the rock. Maybe they had a Clifford Stoll in their pack who didn't like change. I can't understand Clifford Stoll's argument against the super information highway any more than I can understand the cryptogram that he leaves for the reader to ponder at the end of his book. I'm not sure how Ted Kazinsky -- the Unibomber -- viewed the Internet, but I have a feeling he didn't view the Internet too differently from Clifford Stoll's view of the Internet. I've never read a book that I've disagreed with more. The book should have been called Silly Con Snake Oil. Silly because this has to be a joke. Con as in dupe, bamboozle, befool, chicane, flimflam, fool, hoax, hoodwink, hornswoggle, trick; he is trying to con the reader into believing the Internet is no good. Snake Oil, because anyone who will buy into what he's trying to sale is not receiveing the correct medication but a fake placebo. It was hard for me to believe someone with the intelligence that Clifford Stoll supposedly has would write a book like this. People who live in the real world understand the need for computers and the Internet. Clifford Stoll is either on something and spaced out, dumb or just trying to sell a book. He mentioned that a ghost writer helped write his first book. He either needs to quit writing books or find another ghost writer to write for him. The Internet is here to stay; it's not going any where. I have a feeling someone said the same thing about cars, locomotives, the telephone, airplanes, and even the light bulb, but there here to stay and they've made our lives much more easy. If Clifford Stoll wants to keep this life basic, then he's in the minority and maybe he should build a shack in the backwoods of Montana or move in with the chimpanzees. |
|
|